PlaNet www.pl.net
0800 752638
Planet Communications— delivering socially and environmentally conscious internet and media services since 1992.
PlaNet News & Views
|
|
|
Posted on 21-10-2004 Still Ignorant On 'Conflict Diamonds' by Jim Lobe, OneWorld US, Oct. 18, 2004
Nearly two years after the global diamond industry committed itself to
prevent the trade in diamonds from areas where it has fueled civil war and
violence, retailers in the United States and Britain are failing to live
up to their pledges, according to survey released by Amnesty International
and Global Witness Monday.
The survey of leading diamond companies and stores in the two countries
found that fewer than 20 percent of those that responded in writing to the
groups' queries provided a meaningful account of their "conflict
diamonds."
Less than half of diamond jewelry retailers that were visited in 579
stores by the groups' activists were able to give consumers assurances
that the diamonds they sold were conflict-free, according to the survey,
which was released on the eve of a meeting this week by the World Diamond
Congress (WDC) in New York City.
Both groups expressed disappointment with the results, noting that 56
percent of the companies who were sent letters requesting information
about their conflict-diamond policies failed even to respond.
Among them were major diamond retailers, such as Asprey, Theo Fennell and
Debenhams in Britain, and Costco, T.J. Maxx and Kmart in the U.S.
"The continued lack of systematic monitoring throughout the diamond
industry suggests that it is not taking the issue seriously enough," said
Alessandra Masco of Amnesty International.
"The trade in conflict diamonds has been at the heart of some of Africa's
most protracted and bloody wars," she added, citing Angola, the Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC), Liberia and Sierra Leone.
Last year, the Washington Post reported that Al Qaeda has used conflict
diamonds, particularly from Liberia and Sierra Leone, to launder money in
support of its terrorist operations.
The survey was similar to results released by Global Witness, which first
drew attention to the way diamonds were fuelling brutal wars in various
parts of Africa in 2000, last March. Out of 30 retailers visited by the
group's undercover investigators early this year, the salespeople in only
four appeared well informed about their companies' policy and system of
warranties to ensure that they did not sell conflict diamonds.
After a major publicity campaign, which included suggestions of a possible
consumer boycott -- carried out by a number of NGOs, including Global
Witness, Amnesty, Physicians for Human Rights, and several others, the
industry committed approved the so-called "Kimberley Process," a
voluntary, self-policing system designed to ensure that "conflict
diamonds" were kept out of the global trade.
Under Kimberley, all legitimately mined diamonds that is, those which were
not used to buy weapons or sustain insurgencies -- are to be certified at
the point of origin and then subject to a system of warranties from mine
site through buyers, middlemen, polishers, and wholesalers all the way to
the retail display -- would ensure to the eventual consumer that they were
indeed legitimate.
At the same time, the industry committed itself to informing its staff and
salespeople about both conflict diamonds and the regulations designed to
keep them out of the trade.
"Diamond jewelry retailers are the industry's public face and they have a
special responsibility to tackle conflict diamonds by complying with the
self-regulation and by actively promoting compliance by their suppliers,"
said Corinna Gilfillan of Global Witness which, along with Amnesty and
other activist groups, has suggested that government regulation may be
required if the industry cannot police itself adequately.
The latest survey found that 32 out of the 37 companies that responded to
the questionnaire said they were implementing the warranty system and have
a policy to prevent dealing in conflict diamonds, but, of those, only two
provided specific details.
Moreover, despite the industry's commitment to educate employees about the
regulations, staff in only 42 percent of the stores were aware of the
company's policy, although that appeared to be an improvement over the
results published earlier this year.
Similar surveys are being carried out with retailers and suppliers in
Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Switzerland.
Another survey, released earlier this month by the industry-linked,
U.S.-based Jewelry Consumer Opinion Council (JCOC), found that consumer
awareness about conflict diamonds, sometimes called "blood diamonds," may
be flagging.
Out of 3,342 consumers (more than four of five of whom were women) who
responded to its survey, only 15 percent said they had heard of the
expression, "conflict diamond" -- a sharp drop from the 26 percent of
consumers who responded to a similar survey in July, 2003.
The survey, which was conducted via the internet, found that 17 percent of
respondents actually purchased diamonds or diamond jewelry in the previous
six months. Nearly 93 percent of those had purchased jewelry said the
jeweler did not discuss conflict diamonds, and 72 percent said the
diamonds they bought did not come with any documentation or certification
indicated that the diamonds were conflict-free.
But nine percent of all respondents said they considered the country of
origin in their purchasing decisions, up from below one percent in 2000
and 2001.
Moreover, more than 90 percent of respondents said they would not buy a
diamond if they knew it came from a country where social injustice or
violence was occurring as a result of its production. That figure was up
from around 75 percent in 2000 and 2001.
At the same time, almost 97 percent said they were unfamiliar with the
Kimberley Process.
|
