Posted on 6-9-2002
Microsoft
Macroproblem
By STEVE LOHR, NYT, 5 Sept02
Note: PlaNet has used the Linux operating system on many of
its servers
since 1993, Ver 1.0 and continues to use only open source software
on all
PC and Sun platform servers, for example Linux, Apache, PHP,
MySQL, FreeBSD
(the exception is our Cisco routers, which only work with Cisco
OS). PlaNet
has never used any Microsoft proprietory software and has no
plans to do so.
.
Governments around the world, afraid that Microsoft has become
too powerful
in critical software markets, have begun working to ensure an
alternative.
More than two dozen countries in Asia, Europe and Latin America,
including
China and Germany, are now encouraging their government agencies
to use
"open source" software — developed by communities of programmers
who
distribute the code without charge and donate their labor to
cooperatively
debug, modify and otherwise improve the software.
The best known of these projects is Linux, a computer operating
system that
Microsoft now regards as the leading competitive threat to its
lucrative
Windows franchise in the market for software that runs computer
servers.
The foremost corporate champion of Linux is I.B.M., which is
working with
many governments on Linux projects.
Against this opposition, Microsoft has found itself in the uncommon
position of campaigning for the even-handed competition of "a
level playing
field." And I.B.M., once the feared monopolist of the era of
mainframe
computers, is casting itself as a force of liberation from Microsoft,
the
monopolist of today.
Microsoft worries that some governments may all but require
the use of
Linux for their powerful servers, which provide data to large
networks of
computer users. For the most part, the battle does not involve
the kind of
software that runs on the typical computer user's desk.
To curb such moves, Microsoft is backing an industry group called
the
Initiative for Software Choice. The group lists 20 members —
besides the
chip maker Intel , a close ally, most of them small foreign
companies or
organizations. (Illegally stifling choice, of course, was precisely
what
the federal courts in the long-running antitrust case ruled
that Microsoft
did in the market for personal computer software.)
The motivations and actions by foreign governments vary somewhat,
but
mostly they seem to be trying to ensure competition. That was
the stance
taken by a delegation of Chinese officials involved in developing
their
software industry, who visited the United States last month.
In an interview, Jiang Guangzhi, director of a software development
center
in Shanghai, discussed the progress made in China on various
Linux projects
and emphasized that the government did not want one company
"to manipulate
or dominate the Chinese market." With its entry into the World
Trade
Organization, China is facing increased pressure to crack down
on software
piracy, adding to the appeal of free software like Linux, Mr.
Jiang said.
His delegation had attended the LinuxWorld conference in San
Francisco, and
met with I.B.M. executives and its Linux experts at the company's
headquarters in Armonk, N.Y.
Yet Mr. Jiang also spoke glowingly of Microsoft's involvement
in China. The
company set up a research laboratory in Beijing and recently
made a
commitment to invest $700 million in China over the next three
years in
education, training and research, and in investments in local
companies.
"We appreciate Microsoft's contributions," Mr. Jiang said.
To Chinese Communist officials, it seems, Linux is a useful
tool of
pragmatic capitalism to pump-prime market competition to China's
advantage.
The support of open source software by governments around the
world is
rising. There are currently 66 government proposals, statements
and studies
promoting open source software in 25 countries, according to
the Initiative
for Software Choice. The policy statements and legislative proposals
mainly
encourage the use of open source software in government procurement,
and
nearly all of them have cropped up in the last 18 months.
"It's growing, unfortunately, from our perspective," said Mike
Wendy, a
spokesman for the software initiative, which was founded in
May.
The impetus for the international activity was in Europe. A
technology
advisory group to the European Commission issued a report two
years ago
that termed open source software "a great opportunity" for the
region that
could perhaps "change the rules in the information technology
industry,"
wresting the lead in software from the United States and reducing
Europe's
reliance on imports.
As open source software, especially Linux, has spread, countries
in other
regions have also come to regard it as both a model of software
development
and perhaps an engine of economic growth. The government proposals
and
projects are efforts to position their nations to exploit a
promising trend
in technology.
Source code is software rendered in a programming language that
human
programmers can read and understand, before it is compiled down
to the
digital 1's and 0's that the machine processes. Software companies,
like
Microsoft, typically guard their source code as a trade secret,
and
certainly do not allow outsiders to modify or redistribute it.
In the open source model, the source code is freely published
for all to
see. Then, interested programmers — often all over the world,
communicating
over the Internet — work on a project to fix, modify and add
improvements.
These self-selected communities work out their own governing
arrangements
to determine when changes in the code are approved or rejected.
The leading open source projects are Apache , the software most
used for
distributing Web pages to desktop computers, and the Linux operating
system. The kernel, or basic engine, of Linux was initially
developed by
Linus Torvalds, a Finnish programmer who now works in the United
States —
though the operating system itself is a result of work from
many
contributors, including Richard M. Stallman, who leads a free
software
project called GNU.
Just how far the open source model can go is uncertain. The
projects rely
on voluntary contributions from programmers who work at universities,
government laboratories and companies. Money is made in the
open source
environment by supplying technical support, services and writing
applications that run on top of the open source software.
Linux has certainly gone a long way already. Though there are
versions of
Linux that run on desktop PC's, the real success of Linux has
been as an
operating system on larger data-serving machines, which power
computer
networks in corporations and governments and the Internet.
The big market for computer server software is also crucial
to Microsoft's
future. Although the company controls a huge portion of the
personal
computer operating systems market, to keep growing it must push
increasingly into the lucrative market for software that runs
corporate and
government data centers. It is there that Microsoft encounters
what its
senior executives have cited as the two most significant competitive
threats: I.B.M. and free software, notably Linux.
That combination, in Microsoft's view, could be particularly
powerful,
especially if open source software emerges as the most politically
acceptable technological path.
In Germany, for example, the lower house of Parliament adopted
a resolution
last November declaring that the government should use open
source software
"whenever doing so will reduce costs." The resolution also cited
as
advantages "stability" and "security." Microsoft's Windows operating
system
is often criticized for crashing too often and for being susceptible
to
computer viruses and security breaches.
Then in June, the German government and I.B.M. announced a "far-reaching
cooperation agreement" to use open source software in national
and
municipal government agencies. "The fact that Linux provides
a true
alternative to the Windows operating system," said Otto Schily,
the German
interior minister, "increases our independence and improves
our position as
a big customer for software."
The German case, I.B.M. says, is part of an emerging pattern.
"There's not
a large government in the world we're not talking to," said
Steven Solazzo,
general manager of I.B.M.'s Linux business
|