Posted on 7-7-2004
We
Face A Fork in the Road
by James Wallerstedt
Last month, Americans again had the opportunity to watch our
President stare into the teleprompter and confirm our secret
fears that the nation is heading down a dark and dangerous path.
George Bush and those that run Washington alongside him seem
to have a natural fondness for enemies, as well as some talent
for attracting new ones. Disturbingly, President Bush has recently
made it clear that he sees his administration as being "on
a mission for God."
There is evidence of an "end times" interpretation
of events within the White House, whereby unconditionally backing
Israel will lead to Armageddon, which will lead to the Second
Coming of Christ. Meanwhile, a respected and growing segment
of our Christian community - including Bill Moyers and Jimmy
Carter - are speaking out against such fundamentalist interpretations
(which the latter calls "foolish"), as they are clearly
formulas for pitting intolerant Christian and Jewish elements
of society against radical Islam; in a potential, worldwide,
dead-end "Crusade."
Many, therefore, will likely interpret the phrase from the
President's recent speech, "We will finish the job of the
fallen," to mean; at the end of our present course, we,
too, will be fallen. Our national goodwill will be all but destroyed,
our military assets will be useless against a dispersed and
vigorous "enemy," damage to our national economy will
be nearly total (in a recent NY Times article, former Treasury
Secretary Robert Rubin indicates that the American economy may
right now be heading down the same path as...Argentina).
During the last presidential campaign, when asked to name his
"favorite philosopher" in history George Bush answered,
"Jesus." Yet, if we look at the policies of his administration,
we find the very opposite of the qualities that Jesus counselled:
arrogance versus humility
strengthening the strong while weakening the weak
selfishness and materialism versus selflessness and a spiritual
approach to life
an inclination toward revenge instead of forgiveness
a tendency toward competition versus cooperation
disrespect rather than a deep-seated love for nature
a tendency toward secretiveness and subterfuge versus honesty
and openness
It's not for nothing that Jesus advised, "By their fruits
shall ye know them." He and many other sage voices of history
have counselled paying close attention to what people actually
do, versus listening only to their words. George Bush and his
administration talk a good game; patriotism, Christianity. Yet,
they are busy doing just about everything imaginable to contradict
the fundamental teachings both of the Founding Fathers and the
founder of their supposed faith.
"Leave no Child Behind" is poised to leave all American
children behind. The "Clear Skies Initiative" threatens
to pollute our skies forever. The "liberation" of
Iraq is a hated occupation. "Compassionate conservatism"
is busy giving away the store to an already over-privileged
elite. Right down the line, there's the stark contrast between
what's being said and what's being done.
Here's what Walter Cronkite recently said about the situation,
"One sometimes gets the impression that this administration
believes that how it runs the government is its own business
and no one else's. The tight control of information, as well
as the dissemination of misleading information and outright
falsehoods, conjures up a disturbing image of a very different
kind of society. Democracies are not well-run nor long-preserved
with secrecy and lies."
Okay, so GWB seems not to be following very well in the footsteps
of his favorite philosopher. Yet, we might ask, how does the
Bush administration stack up against that other pillar of loyalty
continually evoked, national patriotism? Well, let's consider
what the Founding Fathers might have said...
Given that they tended to identify with Masonry rather than
Christianity, that probably would have positioned them, right
from the start, among the misguided. They were against secrecy
in government. They believed in the separation of church and
state; in freedom of speech and association; in habeus corpus
and freedom from arbitrary search and arrest. Benjamin Franklin
once said, "Those who are willing to forsake their civil
liberties for security, deserve neither." All that would
have put them at odds with the likes of George Bush, Dick Cheney,
John Ashcroft, Don Rumsfeld and various neo-con members of the
present administration.
For those of us who take seriously the symbols of God and flag,
the following should be considered; the greatest crimes of history
have always been committed in the name either of the state,
or religion, or both. Hitler carried out his own evangelical
programs for "the glory of the Fatherland," whilst
Nazi storm-troopers wore belt buckles which proclaimed, "Gott
mit Uns" ("God with us"). In the aftermath of
WWII, good-hearted Germans asked themselves how they might have
avoided being duped by such appeals to their patriotism and
religious loyalty.
The President's favorite philosopher gave us a clue, long ago;
"By their fruits shall ye know them."
America, today, spends more on armaments and military than
all the other nations of the world, combined. We refuse to join
treaties to protect human rights and the environment that nearly
all other nations endorse. UNDP indicates that but a small fraction
of our present military expenditures could solve all the worst
problems of human misery and poverty, on a global basis. Yet,
our administration seems rather uninterested in this prospect.
Identifying and pursuing enemies, instead, has captured their
interest (terrorists versus communists, this time around).
Just imagine what GWB's favorite philosopher might have said
about these priorities.
Humanity confronts a fork in the road, today - one which must
be approached by drawing upon the best of our collective values
and history. Where I part company with fundamentalists and fanatics
of all stripes - political and religious - has to do with the
idea that we can throw away all the most cherished values taught
by the founders of our creeds, while claiming to be acting in
their name.
|