The New Zealand Government is considering making changes to the
Local Government Act which could see local bodies able to meet
drainage costs by a charge based on the amount of water households
used. The NELSON MAIL ARTICLE BELOW claims that the government
is considering changing the law (Rating Powers Act & Local Government
Act) to permit user charges for wastewater without a LATE (like
Metrowater) needing to be established. Since METROWATER LTD Auckland,
as the first and only retail water LATE, has been opposed and
somewhat discredited by the Water Pressure Group in Auckland City,
there is decreasing likelihood that any other local body would
now establish a water company. The AUCKLAND REGION WATER REVIEW
has precisely this end in sight however when it puts forward its
Option One (Modified Status Quo). The only real "modification"
under this option would be that wastewater user charges could
be imposed without a local body needing to commercialise their
water services.
The
massive lobby from the combined pressure of the six municipalities
comprising the Review has been described as containing sufficient
potential weight to convince central government of the "desirability"
of law reform to permit this change. But now it emerges that the
government is apparently independently considering introducing
user charges anyway, ignoring the thousands of People's Option
postcard submissions which were sent to the Minister for Auckland
Issues, Judith Tizard. In spite of a $250,000 publicity budget
hard-selling the review, the PR failed to gain even one third
as evidenced in the numbers of submissions received supporting
the entire three "official" options combined. The Nelson Mail,
27 APRIL 2001. Nelson Mayor Paul Matheson wants to pull the chain
on a Nelson City Council proposal to introduce a toilet tax for
waste water. Mr Matheson said he was opposed to the proposed "toilet
tax" or pan charge, as it disadvantaged the majority of Nelsonians
- those whose properties had a land value less than $80,000. The
toilet tax was approved for inclusion in the council's draft annual
plan in March with little debate and is aimed at shifting the
cost of paying for sewage and wastewater disposal away from a
drainage rate based on land value. It will place more of those
costs on to lower-valued properties.
The
charge would be levied on a property basis, rather than for every
toilet in a household. Mr Matheson said he had to leave early
from the draft annual plan meeting where the issue was discussed
and had not yet had a chance to speak on it. However, he would
be speaking up "as soon as possible", which he expected to be
as part of finalising the draft annual plan. The Government is
considering making changes to the Local Government Act which could
see local bodies able to meet drainage costs by a charge based
on the amount of water households used. Mr Matheson said it made
more sense to wait until those changes had been finalised, which
he expected to be before the end of the Government's term in 2002.
If the toilet tax went ahead, it would mean two changes to the
charging system in two years. "There's been enough changes in
the last few years, without changing that (the drainage rate).
Why don't we just wait." A public meeting is scheduled to be held
on the draft annual plan in May, with submissions on the plan
closing at 4pm on Tuesday May 22.
