Secretary General Kofi Annan has encouraged all UN agencies to
form partnerships with the private sector
posted
16th September 2000
The centerpiece of this initiative is his Global Compact, launched
with the agencies for environment (UNEP), labor (ILO) and human
rights (UNHCHR) in July, 2000. This report argues that corporate
influence at the UN is already too great, and that new partnerships
are leading down a slippery slope toward the partial privatization
and commercialization of the UN system itself. The Secretary General's
office and UN agencies such as UNICEF, UNDP, WHO, and UNESCO are
partnering with corporations known for human, labor and environmental
rights violations. The Global Compact and its cousin partnerships
at other UN agencies threaten the mission and integrity of the United
Nations.
The Global Compact The Global Compact has four major problems:
1.Wrong
Companies: The Secretary General has shown poor judgment by allowing
known human rights, labor and environmental violators to join.
2.Wrong
Relationship: Clearly the UN must have interactions with corporations,
as when they procure goods and services or to hold them accountable,
but it should not aspire to "partnership."
3.Wrong Image: The UN's positive image is vulnerable to being sullied
by corporate criminals, while companies get a chance to "bluewash"
their image by wrapping themselves in the flag of the United Nations.
4.No
Monitoring or Enforcement: Companies that sign-up get to declare
their allegiance to UN principles without making a commitment to
follow them.
The
New Guidelines The new guidelines for UN cooperation with corporations
state that companies that violate human rights "are not eligible
for partnership." Mr. Annan violated the guidelines just a few days
after they were published by inviting Shell to join the Global Compact
and its envisaged partnerships. The UN claims that it lacks the
capacity to monitor corporations' activities. This creates a Catch-22
situation. Without monitoring capacity the UN will not be able to
determine, under its guidelines, if a corporation is complicit in
human rights violations. The Guidelines also provide for the limited
corporate use of the UN logo. This presents a potential marketing
bonanza for companies like Nike.
Toward
a Corporate Free UN If the Global Compact and other corporate partnerships
represent the low-road, then there are four key steps that can be
taken to build a high-road.
1.Support
the Code of Conduct on transnational corporations and human rights
being drafted by the UN Subcomission on Human Rights.
2.Support
UN-brokered multilateral environmental and health agreements which
can reign in abusive corporate behavior on a global scale.
3.Pressure the US government to pay the UN the money it owes with
no strings attached. 4.Support and promote The Citizens Compact,
which calls for a legally binding framework for corporate behavior.
To read the complete report, please see Corporate Watch...
nd to poverty. These foot-soldiers are mobilisi
|