ILO Censures Myanmar Despite Asian Opposition
posted 25th November 2000
By
Gustavo Capdevila
The executive body of the International Labour Organisation (ILO)
had to wend its way through a complicated debate, and the resistance
of Asian nations, to open the way for sanctions against Myanmar
(Burma) for its widespread use of forced labour. The actions could
cost Myanmar aid from other governments, international institutions,
as well as public and private entities. The ILO resolution calls
for the unprecedented implementation on Nov 30 of its constitution's
Article 33, enacting measures of censure against the Myanmar government.
The Myanmar delegation responded by announcing in Geneva that
it would refuse all future collaboration with the ILO. The International
Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU), which headed the campaign
against the Rangoon military regime, estimates there are approximately
one million people subjected to forced labour in Myanmar. The
application of measures by the international community will likely
mean the government's plans to boost income from tourism will
fail. The country took in 100 million tourism dollars in 1999
and had projected 200 million for next year, according to the
ICFTU. The ILO Governing Body stated that its Commission of Inquiry
had not observed progress in Myanmar towards adopting the international
convention against forced labour. As a result, the decisions adopted
last June by the International Labour Conference were left intact,
and call for applying sanctions against an ILO member nation for
the first time in the organisation's 81-year history. Several
Asian nations attempted until the final hour to defer the issue
with a proposal presented by Malaysia, and sponsored by the Philippines,
Indonesia, Singapore and Vietnam, to postpone discussion until
the next sessions of the Conference.
The
Malaysian delegation maintained that the Myanmar government had
made ''serious efforts'' to apply the measures adopted by the
Conference. Other countries that backed delaying action against
Rangoon included China, India, Japan and Russia. Meanwhile, European
and Latin American nations, as well as labour and corporate delegates,
supported the condemnation. The Governing Body, the ILO's executive,
is comprised of 28 government representatives, 14 labour delegates
and several from business organisations. Its decision was based
on the negative report presented by the technical co-operation
mission that visited the country in October. But the origin of
the censure dates back to recommendations made by the 1998 Commission
of Inquiry, which found that forced labour in the country was
''widespread and systematic.'' The Commission's recommendations
called for Myanmar to ''take concrete actions'' toward implementing
the international convention against forced labour, which the
country ratified in 1955. The ICFTU affirmed that, despite the
recommendations, the Myanmar military continued to harass residents
in rural areas, forcing them to perform, without pay, all kinds
of tasks, ranging from road repair, barracks maintenance and weapons
transport to growing crops that were sold for the army's profit.
The
Brussels-based global union said the Myanmar military dictatorship
is concerned that sanctions could strangle the country's economy,
which - apart from drug-trafficking - depends heavily on sales
to Thailand of natural gas from the deposits in the Andaman Sea.
The international sale of natural gas was made possible by the
pipeline built by Elf-Total-Fina and Unocal, two companies ''harshly
criticised for their use of forced labour and the displacement
of the local population,'' said the ICFTU. The sanctions of the
International Labour Conference, to take effect at the end of
this month, call for a full investigation, trial and punishment
for those found guilty of forced labour. They also establish that
future sessions of the Conference will assess ''the implementation
of the Commission of Inquiry's recommendations at future sessions
of the Conference so long as Myanmar has not been shown to have
fulfilled its obligations.'' Another point of the resolution recommends
that ILO members ''review their relations with Myanmar and take
appropriate measures to ensure that such relations do not perpetuate
or extend the system of forced or compulsory labour in that country.''
ILO Director-General, Juan Somavía, is to ''inform international
organisations working with the ILO to reconsider any co-operation
they may be engaged in with Myanmar and,if appropriate, to cease
as soon as possible any activity that could have the effect of
directly or indirectly abetting the practice of forced or compulsory
labour.''
