Posted
31st July 2001
Drowning In The Knowledge Wave
by
Alan Marston
That smile on the face of GE Commissioners and Labour party
Ministers reflects not joy, but fear. Fear of the machine. It's
my observation that the ruling ethos of our time is the ethos
of the machine, more, bigger, faster, cheaper, lose that race
and you go straight to dump.
Undoubtedly
only a minority of people are able and ready to out-stare the
machine and live by older rules and values, but does that make
the minority wrong? Coming from me that's a rhetorical question
of course. Also asked and answered is any expectation that those
who live by the machine will listen to those who don't. Putting
on the Hegelian philosophy as history hat, one must conclude
that like the vast majority of civilisations that have gone
before, this one will learn by its mistakes. However unlike
previous civilisations, the mistakes are somewhat more catastrophic
than they used to be and there is the possibility... I'll leave
the rest to the corner doomsayer.
Meanwhile, appealing to reason, Greenpeace's comments on the
Royal Commission in GE in NZ report:
ėMore
and more cases around the world are showing that field trials
cannot be contained and GE contamination is inevitable. The
Commission has expressed the desire to have GE, conventional,
Integrated Pest Management and organic systems together. That
is simply not possible,î said Annette Cotter, Greenpeace campaigner.
ėThe report has also failed to reflect tangata whenua concerns,
or strong public sentiment towards a GE free NZ,î said Ms Cotter.
Ninety two percent of the 11 000 public submissions to the Commission
were opposed to GE in the environment. ėWhile the Commission
has recognised the scientific uncertainties of GE, Greenpeace
believes the Commission has failed to adequately apply the precautionary
principle which is at the core of the issue. This means that
their assessment of GE is fundamentally flawed.
ėThis may go some way to explaining why, in the body of their
report they say that ėLittle is yet known about the environmental
impacts of genetically modified organisms, and in particular
in New Zealand ëon the potential adverse effects, or risks of
such effects, on the indigenous biotaíî (Ch 6, p 142), yet their
recommendations do not fully reflect these concerns. ėThe release
of GE into the environment is now a political decision, and
the Labour Government will have to make that decision with public
opinion front of mind,î said Ms Cotter...
|