
EU
Scientist Wants Chemicals Info Made Public
posted
9thAugust 2000
LONDON,
Aug. 2, 2000 The assessment of chemical risks in the European
Union is being hampered because too little information on exposure
to harmful substances is made public, a top EU scientist said Monday.
Addressing a conference on risk assessment in EU policy making,
James Bridges, head of the EU scientific committee on toxicology,
ecotoxicology and the environment, said laws on information disclosure
were not strong enough. "We have to move on from a situation where
90% of toxicological information is marked confidential," Bridges
said. "We need more information on how chemicals may or may not
be affecting humans in practice." A lack of information meant there
were "major shortcomings" in the field of exposure analysis, he
added. "We can't move forward as we ought to unless access to data
is much more effective than currently." Bridges went on to criticize
laws preventing authorities from accessing data from one product
to use in assessments of others. "We're unable to draw on data for
other substances" because there are "legal constraints on product
comparison," he said.
One
task of Bridges' committee is to ensure quality in the EU's "existing
substances" review program, which evaluates chemicals marketed in
the EU before a strict authorization procedure was introduced in
1981. The program puts most of the burden of work on governmental
authorities rather than industry and is seriously behind schedule
A chemicals policy overhaul currently underway is likely to shift
responsibilities toward industry. The chemicals sector has already
anticipated the changes and has launched voluntary research programs
to assess the intrinsic hazards of high production chemicals and
the long-term health and environmental effects of their products.
Everyone is now in the global economy, a social environment heavily
dominated by privately owned industrial groupings. If Governments
are not willing to represent public interests in such matters as
environmental toxins and genetic manipulation of organisms then
out of frustration the public will inevitably take the law into
its own hands. Industry is going to find itself public enemy number
one and shouldn't feign shock or surprise when it is confronted
by protest of both a peaceful nature and otherwise.. .rs
and posters with messages that demand jobs and an end to poverty.
These foot-soldiers are mobilisi

|