Posted on 31-3-2003
BBC
Worried About Truth
by Ciar Byrne, Friday March 28, 2003
BBC news chiefs have met to discuss the increasing problem of
misinformation coming out of Iraq as staff concern grows at
the series of
premature claims and counter claims by military sources.
As a result the corporation has reinforced the message to correspondents
that they must clearly attribute information to the military
when it has
not been backed up by another source. "There's been a discussion
about
attribution and it's been reinforced with people that we do
have to
attribute military information," said a BBC spokeswoman. "We
have to be
very careful in the midst of a conflict like this one to be
very sure when we're reporting something we've not seen with
our own eyes
that we attribute it," she added.
On nearly every day of the war so far there have been reports
that could be
seen as favourable to coalition forces, which have later turned
out to be
inaccurate. Earlier this week there was confusion over whether
there had
been an uprising in the key southern city of Basra. A British
forces
spokesman, Group Captain Al Lockwood, said on Thursday there
had been a
"popular uprising", but this was denied by Iraqi authorities.
By last
Sunday the southern Iraqi seaport of Umm Qasr had been reported
"taken"
nine times, while reports of the discovery of a chemical weapons
factory in
An Najaf have not been confirmed - just two more examples of
the confusion
over what is coming out of military sources. "We're absolutely
sick and
tired of putting things out and finding they're not true. The
misinformation in this war is far and away worse than any conflict
I've
covered, including the first Gulf war and Kosovo," said a senior
BBC news
source. "On Saturday we were told they'd taken Basra and Nassiriya
and then
subsequently found out neither were true. We're getting more
truth out of
Baghdad than the Pentagon at the moment. Not because Baghdad
is putting out
pure and morally correct information but because they're less
savvy about
it, I think. "I don't know whether they [the Pentagon] are putting
out
flyers in the hope that we'll run them first and ask questions
later or
whether they genuinely don't know what's going on - I rather
suspect the
latter."
Earlier this week the BBC's director of news, Richard Sambrook,
admitted it
was proving difficult for journalists in Iraq to distinguish
truth from
false reports, and that the pressures facing reporters on 24-hour
news
channels had led to premature or inaccurate stories. Veteran
war
correspondent Martin Bell has called for 24-hour news channels
to "curb
their excitability" and warned against unsubstantiated reports
which may
help the allied cause, but later turn out to be false. The Times
journalist
Janine di Giovanni has also said that the demands of
real-time television, combined with the restrictions placed
on reporters in
Baghdad by the Iraqis and the difficulties of getting to the
front line are
making it virtually impossible for journalists to cover the
war properly.
|