Posted on 1-8-2002
Easing
Palestine's Humanitarian Crisis
By PETER HANSEN
GAZA CITY — A consensus has emerged in the Middle East, among
people of
otherwise widely divergent views, on one point: something must
be done for
ordinary families in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. They face
a crisis of
such dimensions that it threatens everyone in the region.
Two weeks ago, Ariel Sharon, Israel's prime minister, telephoned
Kofi
Annan, the United Nations secretary general, to ask for an international
effort to help the Palestinian people. Last Wednesday Daniel
Kurtzer, the
American ambassador to Israel, calling the situation in the
territories "a
humanitarian disaster," urged Israel to lift travel restrictions
on
Palestinians. And on Friday The New York Times reported on an
ongoing study
by the United States Agency for International Development that
has found
dramatically increased malnutrition and anemia among Palestinian
children.
By Sunday, Prime Minister Sharon had announced an easing of
travel and
other restrictions and had named Foreign Minister Shimon Peres
to
coordinate relief for the Palestinians. The United Nations hopes
these
decisions will be swiftly implemented in such a way that they
make a
substantive difference to ordinary Palestinians.
Mr. Sharon's phone call came on a day when Mr. Annan was meeting
in New
York with his colleagues in the Quartet — Secretary of State
Colin Powell,
Russia's foreign minister, Igor Ivanov, and Javier Solana, the
European
Union's high representative. They agreed that full humanitarian
access
would be the fastest way to begin improving the Palestinians'
plight and
that the United Nations should lead the humanitarian effort.
The United
Nations already has the largest humanitarian operation on the
ground in the
Middle East, with 10,500 staff members in the West Bank and
Gaza alone: the
United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees.
Since 1950,
the agency has catered to the basic health, education and welfare
needs of
refugees from the 1948 Arab-Israeli War and their descendants
— some of
whom still live in so-called refugee camps, which are townships
of two- and
three-story buildings, while many others are scattered across
the region.
Since September 2000, the agency has also been trying to lessen
the
humanitarian impact of violence, curfews and closures on the
refugees in
the West Bank and Gaza. It has greatly increased its provision
of food aid:
whereas before the strife such aid went to 11,000 refugee families,
it is
now reaching almost 220,000 families. As the Palestinian economy
has
stagnated, the demands on agency resources have soared. Israel
has long
understood that the relief agency's work is an important factor
in the
stability of the large Palestinian population on its doorstep.
In 1967,
when it took control of the West Bank and Gaza, Israel asked
the agency to
continue its work there — a responsibility that, without the
agency, would
have fallen on Israel's shoulders. More recently, in November
2001, the
Israeli delegate to the United Nations General Assembly expressed
Israel's
"appreciation for the efforts of UNRWA in providing important
services,
especially in the fields of health care and education."
Despite such statements, there have been attacks on the agency
by some
commentators in Israel and America alleging, wrongly, that the
relief
agency is not part of the solution to the violence in the region,
but is
part of the problem. The agency faces many difficulties in serving
such a
highly politicized population, even though it does not police
or administer
the refugee camps (where a third of refugees live). The agency
is committed
to ensuring that its installations remain free of militant activity
and
demands that its 22,000 staff members — 99 per cent of whom
are Palestinian
refugees — do not allow their political beliefs to interfere
with their
duties. These efforts have brought attacks from Arab commentators
(and some
in the agency's staff union) claiming that the agency suppresses
freedom of
speech.
However, in an environment as polarized as the Middle East,
the agency
would soon lose all credibility if it allowed its commitment
to the norms
of justice to be diluted by a fear of criticism, regardless
of where it
might come from. The agency is working with its donors to tackle
some of
the difficulties created by the political landscape. For several
years it
has produced school materials promoting tolerance, nonviolent
conflict
resolution and human rights. The agency plans to expand this
program with
further financial support from the United States, which has
long been the
most generous backer of Palestinian refugee relief. Such support
from the
international community is vital if the relief and works agency
is to
continue to operate apolitically in a politically polarized
region — and to
relieve the desperate situation of Palestinian refugees.
Peter Hansen is commissioner general of the United Nations Relief
and Works
Agency.
|