Posted
28th June 2001
By Thalif Deen
What A Difference A Billion Doesn't Make
After a slow and hesitant start, the much-ballyhooed Global
AIDS Fund has garnered close to one billion dollars in contributions
- still far short of its target of seven billion to 10 billion
dollars per year to fight the deadly disease. The pledges and
contributions came during the three-day UN General Assembly
Special Session on HIV-AIDS, scheduled to end here Wednesday.
The United Kingdom doubled its original contribution Tuesday,
matching the 200 million dollars pledged by the United States
last month. The two governments are the fund's largest contributors.
So
far, total contributions have amounted to more than 920 million
dollars, including new contributions from Norway (110 million
dollars), Sweden (60 million dollars) and Canada (73 million
dollars). Last month, France pledged about 127 million dollars
to the fund. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a private
charity set up by the Microsoft founder, contributed 100 million
dollars. Three African countries - each stricken with AIDS and
each saddled with financial troubles including extensive foreign
debt - pledged 13 million dollars Monday. Commitments included
10 million dollars from Nigeria, two million dollars from Uganda,
and one million dollars from Zimbabwe.
Sue
Markham, spokesperson for the President of the General Assembly,
told reporters that the special session "was not expected to
be a pledging conference" although most pledges were made during
the meeting. The contributions show a high level of political
commitment by member states, Markham said. She added that some
of the contributions were spread over a three-year period while
others were for general spending on AIDS and were not earmarked
for the global fund. The Irish government said it would spend
an additional 30 million dollars per year directly on helping
the world's poorer nations, while Finland said it would contribute
about six million dollars to UNAIDS, the joint UN agency coordinating
the world body's response to the pandemic.
Members of the Group of Eight - the 'Group of Seven' industrial
powers plus Russia - reportedly will wait to announce additional
contributions until their summit in Genoa, Italy next month.
The group's core members are Canada, France, Germany, Italy,
Japan, the United Kingdom, and United States. When UN Secretary-General
Kofi Annan proposed the creation of the AIDS fund last March,
he aimed at a 10-billion-dollar target, setting the minimum
amount needed at seven billion dollars. UN officials said they
expected pledges to inch above the billion- dollar mark by the
end of this week's special session - leaving a huge shortfall.
The fund is primarily aimed at controlling AIDS but would also
be used to fight tuberculosis and malaria. According to Julia
Celeves, a UNAIDS senior policy officer, only about 1.8 billion
dollars is currently being spent on AIDS annually - or between
5.2 billion and 8.2 billion dollars less than what's needed.
Even
as US Secretary of State Colin Powell told delegates Monday
that the 200-million-dollar US pledge was only seed money,"
several anti-AIDS activists and non-governmental organisations
dismissed the US contribution as too little, too late. Powell
said the US contribution was meant to jump start the global
fund and help generate "billions more from donors all over the
world," adding: "More will come from the United States as we
learn where our support can be most effective." Paul Davis of
the non-governmental Health GAP Coalition said the US pledge
- roughly equivalent to three dollars per person with AIDS in
sub-Saharan Africa - would be "enough to buy dinner (but) not
enough to save a life." Of the 36 million people the UN estimates
live with HIV-AIDS worldwide, more than 25 million are in Africa.
Following Washington's "dubious lead," Davis said, several other
countries have contributed much smaller amounts, jeopardising
the fund's ability to make a meaningful impact against the epidemic.
Mark Curtis of the UK charity Christian Aid warned, however,
that even if fully financed, the fund risked raising false expectations
that the spreading disease could be tackled with drugs alone.
"Christian Aid believes the international community needs to
direct its energy towards massive increases in aid through existing
channels," he argued. "It also needs to focus on reforming those
existing channels rather than being distracted by discussions
of a new fund." Tim Atwater of Jubilee USA, a group lobbying
to cancel poor countries' foreign debts, said "the 200 million
dollars which (President George W.) Bush has pledged is the
same amount as sub- Saharan Africa spends on debt payments in
less than a week." The US Congress could write the cheque on
a Monday and by Friday, Africa would have paid it back, he said.
Lucy Matthew of London-based Drop the Debt said that in one
day, Malawi spends on debt servicing what it would cost to train
160 new teachers.
Some
30 percent of the country's schoolteachers are infected with
HIV, according to UN estimates. In Zambia, where one child in
seven is an orphan because of HIV- AIDS, four days of debt repayments
could cover the annual costs of housing and feeding some 10,000
children, she added.
|